Thursday, December 9, 2010

Moving from Insight to Innovation


Innovation comes in many forms and magnitudes, all of which stem from a “click” or an insight. The insight kicks a presumption to the curb, making way for a new possibility to rush in. This happened for us several times this year, and I’d like to share just four of them with you.

Didn't get a chance to read the full article? Click Here

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Big Box, Blank Slate: Repurposing Vacant Large Format Stores


While hundreds of new big boxes are built each year, hundreds are also vacated. But, at 150,000 square feet or more, large format stores are difficult to re-purpose due to their size and massing, and often closed stores become derelict, sitting empty and overgrown while setting a precedent for an area’s decline. Couldn’t there be a more productive use—and better return—for abandoned big boxes? What could that look like today—and 50 years out?

Didn't get a chance to read the article? Click here

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

BIMtastic! Why BIM’s a Big Deal


Building Information Modeling (BIM) software allows architects to design and virtually build in 3-D—from the start. But it’s more than a replacement for the 2-D CAD. BIM’s like a tail wagging the dog: Using this software changes the relationships between architects, their clients, their sub-consultants, and the contractor by encouraging much more collaboration. And this change is good.

Did you miss John's article? Click Here to read it.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Strategies that Make your Workspace a Workhorse while Cutting Real Estate Costs


Instead of creating a new interior design for one workspace, design strategist Liz Robinson created a model of real estate management that could be adopted at different scales and locations, depending on a corporation’s strategic business plan. In other words, this design doesn’t start by thinking about a workspace’s appearance or size, but considers how workspaces and real estate could function more effectively and strategically for organizations and their employees. Results? At a multi-national aerospace company, the plan reduced rent globally by 25% over four years, improved the company’s brand recognition, and responded to the need for more collaboration and flexibility for today’s and tomorrow’s workforce .

Did you miss Liz's article? Click Here to read it.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Know When to Hold ‘Em: Playing your Cards to Make Permitting Easier


For many projects, public opposition is expected. For large-format stores—which are notorious NIMBY lightning rods—it’s become unavoidable. Permits can be stalled by concerned citizens, concession-seekers, or local jurisdictions bent on stalling the process. They all soak up time, which is of course money, especially for retailers, who lose revenue every day they’re not open. So what can be done to overcome NIMBY issues that hold things up?

Didn't get a chance to read Justin's article? Click Here

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Can foreign architects bridge communication gaps in China’s design process so more sustainable buildings can be built there faster?


Today, buildings emit 40% of the world’s carbon. And by 2035, China alone will construct five million more buildings, equivalent to 10 New York Cities. Here, we define some presumptions about this huge sustainable building opportunity, and how architects can encourage more and better sustainable designs to be built in China.

Didn't get a chance to read Ming's article? Click Here

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Would a remixed mixed-use spur development in the U.S? What do you think?


May’s issue proposes that examples of more diverse mixed-use abroad—with its better returns, can inspire global developers to do better and U.S. developers to get out of a rut. MulvannyG2 Principal Greg Carpenter asks: Do you think the prospect of remixed mixed-use would spur development in the U.S.? Well, do you? Click to the right, vote, and then comment!

Didn't get a chance to read Greg's article? Click here

Monday, May 24, 2010

Results: Workplaces design for collaboration net greater profit margins

91% of our readers believe workplaces designed for collaboration net greater margins. That’s according to the poll in last month’s issue of ReThink Architecture. Read comments on April’s topic below!

A Sample of Reader Comments:

"(I just) moved from a 1970s office building–very stark, bad lighting, claustrophobic–into a new, open, bright workspace, and I simply feel better. If I feel better, I’m able to work better, increasing my company’s profit margin."

"Definitely. We spend a majority of our day in the workplace. If people are comfortable and happy in their environment, it makes them want to come to work, work harder, and excel."

"Absolutely. 100%. If you are comfortable, relaxed, and in a good mindset, then you are more apt to work and think more freely and harder. I think working in a cool space helps you to ‘want’ to be at work."

"Get rid of the cubicle walls, and you’ll have dramatic increases in communication, morale, productivity and profit."

Thanks to our readers for their many comments!


Results: De-branding is the new branding.

Turns out, 75% of you are sick of being branded to. That’s according to the poll in the March launch issue of ReThink Architecture.

A Sample of Reader Comments:

"Although I think brand identity is important, much of retail branding is … obviously phony … It’s over-the-top marketing that quickly becomes unbelievable and ends up hurting ratherthan helping establish a solid company image."

"I can tell when I walk into a store or hotel that’s been branded to a specific age group that isnot me. It makes me feel unwelcome and uncomfortable. I think we need to get back to thebasics of design—proportions, proper use of natural and artificial lighting, quality details andmaterials—something that people of all demographics can recognize and appreciate."

"We loved branding. Now we hate branding. And, yet, we know (de-branding’s) still branding.We are all still born consumers."

Thanks to our readers for their many comments!

Come Together: Workplaces designed for collaboration net greater margins

Last month, our launch issue asked if you’re sick of being branded to. A vast majority, 75%, said oh, yes, sick of it, and 25% of you apparently want more! Why? One reader said branded environments make her feel uncomfortable, like it’s a ploy she’s walked into. Another, resigned to branding, said we’re all born consumers, and de-branding is just "another example of the pendulum swinging."

Let’s keep the discussion going. Again, ReThink Architecture is a conversation between MulvannyG2 Architecture and our readersthat examines how we’re thinking about design, our industry and our practice in light of the post-recessionary economy.

So, on to our second issue. Today we’re discussing how coworkers learn from one another and how workplace design can enable that. Studies show that 80% of organizational learning comes through informal conversation and only 20% through formal training. Basically, you learn from each other, and workplace design can intentionally encourage the collaboration that, some say, increases profits. In the end, the question is: Can a workplace design boost a firm’s profit margin?

There’s been a lot of talk in the past two years about a study that points to not only increased collaboration, retention, innovation and productivity, but increased profits, yes, profits because of better workplace design. Speculation about a positive correlation between design and margin continues today, when companies are still watching every penny, scrutinizing every expense, despite news that the bowof the economy’s ship is lifting.

Also during this time, our industry bandied the term "working smarter," which has grown trite. Of course we have to work smarter! The danger of that phrase is that it cannot become a euphemism for consolidating and cutting space without considering a new paradigm for the way the workplace—the way workers—work today and will be working tomorrow. Rather than measuring real estate effectiveness by square footage, measure how well it encourages employees of different specialties and generations to gather in both spontaneous and formal ways. Only design that considers collaboration and plays to it, while using resources judiciously, will transform an organization’s culture—and margin.

Consider these stats on the positive effects of collaboration:

- Workplaces that promote collaboration, learning and socialization have more engaged employees and higher profits than those that focus more on "heads-down" work. Profits at such companies were 14 percent greater than those with more traditional work environments.

- Socializing was almost three times as critical to employees at top-performing companies, 20 percent vs. 7 percent, compared to average companies surveyed.

- Employees at top-ranked companies consider collaboration twice as critical to job success as average companies, 43 percent vs. 21 percent, and spend 23 percent more time collaborating than average companies.

–Human Resource Executive, "Profiting from Workplace Design," November 2008*

Why now? You may be wondering, why this emphasis on workplace collaboration now? Well, we’re coming out of the cube farm. Forty years ago we moved from the private office to the cube to save real estate costs, typically the second-largest corporate expense after personnel. While cubes accommodated a growing management rank and created a now often parodied form of privacy, no one knew what the other was doing. Since then, we’ve learned from Dilbert, realizing that the cube’s isolation contributesto stagnation.

I’ve also found that a more qualitative sense of the workplace supports those statistics above: A great design that reinforces brand and collaboration can shift the phrase "I have to go to work" to "I want to go to work." That one-word change lifts an organization remarkably. Design can do that by engaging employees and building brand equity. Here’s how:

Engage employees. For every 10 employees, design one collaborative space—an informal conference area, a "living room"—that pulls colleagues of different practice areas, generations, and personality types out of their office or cube comfort to talk to one another. They’ve got to be compelling spaces to do that! The designers of Google’s headquarters implement this strategy, too. People not only clamor to work there, Google gets countless requests for workspace tours! Collaborative spaces there include "igloos" for a small meeting of three, mock ski gondolas for two-person meetings, or, for larger meetings, tongue-in-cheek English "libraries" with tufted, Regency-style velvet sofas and faux "stacked book shelf" wallpaper.

Build brand equity. A quick case study: We renovated the office of Portland, Ore.-based law firm Tonkon Torp LLP, where people now want to go to work to talk to one another. Tonkon Torp was about to renew its lease for the first time in 20 years, and took the opportunity to improve its space—something that hadn’t been altered since 1989—to reflect how the firm has evolved with changes in the delivery of law.

Today, Tonkon Torp’s office galvanizes the firm’s shift to a more collaborative business model, cross-selling numerous legal services to each client. Sharing client information is crucial now relative to the firm’s siloed, ‘80s model of delivery, akin to one service per client.

To encourage the trust required of this new model, we reinforced communication with a branded stairwell that links all three office floors. We also created eight open community meeting spaces from formerly closed (and choice) partner offices along the floors’ perimeters. The spaces’ placement among the floors sustains and spurs different legal specialties’ adjacencies while the allusions of their ambiance—coffee shop, gallery, living room, rec room—cue the relaxed congeniality found in those places. They encourage the impromptu sharing of knowledge among specialties and four generations—Traditionalists, Boomers, GenX, and Millennials, and foster a greater identity with Tonkon Torp’s brand. The result: When the right work mode balance is reached, workers thrive, interacting with one another and their environment in ways that enhance the quantity and quality of the work they deliver.

We’ve finally figured it out: Communication, collaboration, innovation, productivity. They’re causal. Now you decide if profits are, too: Do you think workplace design can boost profit margin? Let’s talk about it!

De-branding is the new branding.

Whether we’re talking about a store, a mall, or an office space, everyone—designers, developers, architects—have joined Tom Brokaw, Malcolm Gladwell, and Paco Underhillin the discussion of generations and demographics and their wider implications onour society. Pretty much any place designed today has been crafted with the preferencesand needs of its users categorized according to generation.

That said, GenY is going to be the most powerful generation yet, in terms of numbers–80 million–and spending power. Just a tad larger than the Boomers’ 78 million, GenY will hit peak spendingat the average age of 47, around 2027. So designers need to spend the next 15 years or so honing howwe can help our clients tweak, realign or overhaulhow they attract GenY to their stores, malls, offices, and hotels.

De-branding is the new branding. One thing that’s important to GenY is (perceived) authenticity and community connection. They’re sick of being branded to. One strategy of retailing and marketing that addresses this is de-branding. De-branding is a return to authenticity and community involvement, but, perhaps cynically, it must be acknowledgedthat de-branding is really a new branding technique.

A good example of de-branding in a retail environment is Starbuck’s new coffee shop, named 15th Avenue Coffee & Tea, in Seattle’s trendy Capitol Hill neighborhood. Opened in summer 2009, it’s a Starbucks very well camouflaged as a local coffee shop, and yet this "secret" Starbucks has been very well publicized by the company. 15th Avenue Coffee & Tea has no typical Starbucks signage. Its website is http://www.streetlevelcoffee.com/, not a subpage of starbucks.com. It sells no Frappucinos. It offers no drip, but French pressed coffee instead.

Those who don’t know about its Starbucks ownership would be none-the-wiser once inside the eco-friendly store. A well-known local Seattle breadmaker supplies bread for the store’s fresh-made sandwiches, and a local foodbank receives its leftovers. All in all, the new non-Starbucks Starbucks hearkens to its original 1971 store in Seattle’s Pike Place Market. Today, its 15th Avenue store nods to that more authentic coffee house experience, strategically de-branding before the company veers into McStarbucks territory.

A good example of this in terms of branded goods is Muji, a Japanese retailer with the motto "lower priced for a reason." Muji’s high quality, basic product, from office supplies to socks, offers clean design with minimal packaging. Muji’s "no brand" strategy—a premise of authenticity—funnels the money Muji saves from not advertising and relying on word of mouth into R&D to develop better products. Of course, it’s ironic that this "no brand" is now an international brand.

But will it work? Muji’s "simple, functional, affordable" strategy appeals to the marketing-weary, design-savvy consumer who hates logos, supports the environment, and wants value–also hallmarks of GenY. The brand started out as authentically generic; now it’s a brand cultivating its non-brand in the name of authenticity. 15th Avenue Coffee & Tea points to a nostalgia for mom-and-pops of yesteryear. But old school authenticity could mean poor service and bad lighting. (By the way, 15th Avenue Coffee & Tea is incredibly well-done and intentional, with impeccable merchandising and plenty of daylighting, even in Seattle.)

So, does GenY want the real, or a real mediated by what we’ve come to expect of all retailers because of our "Starbucks expectations," which, ironically, even tempers the "authentic" experience of the new stealth Starbucks?

Let’s talk about it: Are you sick of being branded to?

Welcome to Rethink Architecture!

The past two years’ economic crisis is unlike any today’s workforce has experienced, and we doubt we’ll ever return to the indulgence of pre-August 2008. The new normalwe now navigate has not just asked but required all companies to change their behavior and their thinking. With ReThink Architecture, we’re offering you the ways our thinking has changed to help our industry and practice, and we’re asking you to join us in a conversation about what that change means for all of us.

Let's Rethink Architecture.